Certification: Worth the Time and Money?

by Julie Kirst 3/17/2010 2:18:00 PM

When the discussion rolls around to certification, it always brings comments from every end of the spectrum. Recently, writer Greg Thompson spoke with Biomedtalk listserv founder and a member of 24x7’s editorial advisory board Michael Kauffman, CBET, assistant director of facilities at the Reading Hospital and Medical Center, Reading, Pa, and got his views on this subject. We invite you to comment on this blog and add your ideas on the topic—is it important as the profession moves forward? Can the profession come to a unified agreement?

24x7: In these economic times, is certification, or credentialing, a good use of scarce resources?

Michael Kauffman: I support credentialing and I like to see it. We actually pay a little bit more to credentialed personnel. It is one of the steps that an employee here has to reach prior to getting to the top of the payroll. I think it is important, and I think biomeds are wrong for not uniting and agreeing on that fact.

24x7: Some biomeds say credentialing is overrated. How do you respond to that? 

Kauffman: Credentialing is certainly more book study than anything. You could just book study to become a certified biomedical technician. It’s not the same as being trained to repair a ventilator, for example. You can’t learn that from a book.

 

24x7: What is the general feeling among biomeds about the value of credentialing?

Kauffman: I run one of the biomed list services in the United States, and whenever that topic comes up it gets insane. There is just a group of people out there who have a difficult time passing theoretical tests, because that’s what it is. And there are some people who have the ability to mechanically fix things without the theoretical knowledge base that the CBET test is. I try to see that side of the game, and I just can’t.

I can only speak for the side of why you should get certified, and that is because to folks that don’t know you, unfortunately, alphabets behind your name mean something, and it shows a level of education that you obtained—a minimum level in my opinion. Its sets you apart from somebody right out of high school that is going to go fix medical equipment, and I have a hard time seeing why someone would not support it.

24x7 would like to thank Mike for his time and we again invite your response.

 


 

Bookmark and Share

Comments

Posted by Seth Pargeaux, 3/21/2010 8:58:45 AM

Certification is about satisfying arbitrary job qualifications. For older biomeds already in the field and doing well, it is useless. I know the equipment better than the back of my hand, so it is a waste of time to seek initials.

Posted by Seth Pargeaux, 3/21/2010 10:00:03 AM

Not sure if my earlier comment went in... Essentially for older biomeds, the certifications are nothing more than useless initials to satisfy job requirements. In many cases, they do nothing to actually improve job performance and help patients. Youngsters looking to move on up, however, will likely have to go through the process.

Posted by Dick, 3/22/2010 3:54:41 AM

When I got certified I was very excited.  Being certified was a big accomplishment for me.  That was many many years ago and I am still very excited.  Being certified placed me slightly ahead of the other technicians I was working with at the time and since then it has always been an advantage.  Whenever I went fot a job interview anywhere I was always the candidate that was selected.  I am not sure if it was because of my certification or not but I feel comfortable saying that it was.  If you are thinking about it then think no longer and go get certified.

Posted by Chris Walton , 3/27/2010 5:17:00 AM

Certification is somewhat like getting a 4-year degree.  It may or may not help a person in their BMET career, but it does tell a prospective employeer that you have the 'discipline' to work through it.  Same is true for CBET.  Also, you are required to 'maintain' the certification.  I find that many people who are attending the BioMed workshops in our State are doing so to maintain certification.  Keeping up-to-date (by getting outside of your own hospital environment) has got to be a postitive thing. Does having certification mean that you are a better BMET than the person who doesn't?  Probably not.  But, it says a little about your attitude towards education in general.  

Posted by Chad Matzen, 4/21/2010 2:56:53 AM

The legitimacy of certification will not be fully realized until the 2 year experience requirement is lifted.  Facilities would be more inclined to require certification if newly graduated students were able to be certified.  Facilities cannot currently require entry level techs to be certified simply because they cannot be certified.  It is unappealing for someone to go through all of the trouble of passing the CBET only to have to wait to be fully certified.  (I work at a facility where all eligible techs are certified.  This is only to achieve a higher pay grade).

Posted by David Meador, 4/29/2010 6:16:20 AM

Certification requires an expenditure of time and money to get and maintain a certification. There has to be an economic advantage to certification (that means you get paid more).  Without at least a break-even increase in compensation, it makes no economic sense to get certified.  Then we have to look at some of the other reasons:  is there a definite increase in skill conveyed by certification; does it make you more likely to be promoted; does it increase your standing among peers; is it a condition of employment?  Certification for it's own sake is not relevant nor does it appeal to the practical mind that is drawn to the biomed field.  A vanity license plate is cheaper and serves the same function.  It's time to rethink certification so that there will be no argument whether or not it is worth having.

Add comment




biuquote
Loading



Categories

None

Tags

Powered by BlogEngine.NET 1.6.1.0