Search       
 

About 24X7
Contact Us
Subscribe
Read Weekly eNewsletter
HOME | NEWS | CURRENT ISSUE | BUYER'S GUIDE | CLASSIFIEDS | ARCHIVES | CALENDAR | RESOURCES | CAREERS
Issue: April 2003
Article Tools
Email This Article
Reprint This Article
Write the Editor

Turbulence Over Telemetry

by David Hannon

A patient-monitoring scare in 1998 prompted the Federal Communications Commission to set aside a chunk of spectrum for medical telemetry, which it did in August 2000. Since then, hospitals have been mulling their choices: ISM band or WMTS? Both have their advantages and their advocates. Read what the experts have to say: Jim Welch states the case for ISM; David Pettijohn weighs in on the side of WMTS.

 David Pettijohn, left
Jim Welch, right

The story, by now, is legendary. In February 1998 a Dallas television station, testing its brand-new digital broadcasting signal, accidentally crippled the wireless patient monitoring telemetry systems at Baylor University Medical Center and Methodist Medical Center. Stunned hospital personnel reportedly took nine hours to figure out the source of the problem.

No patients were injured, but the incident prompted the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to designate a chunk of spectrum for medical telemetry. In August 2000, the FCC set aside 14 MHz for the Wireless Medical Telemetry Service (WMTS), divided into three frequency bands: 608-614 MHz, 1395-1400 MHz and 1429-1432 MHz. In April 2001, the FCC named the American Society of Healthcare Engineering (ASHE) of the American Hospital Association (AHA) as the “frequency coordinator” for WMTS. ASHE has since selected Comsearch (Ashburn, Va.) as its technical partner charged with performing frequency coordination services in the WMTS.

Medical telemetry continues to be a hot topic as hospitals debate moving to the new Wireless Medical Telemetry Service spectrum. But the existing Industrial, Scientific and Medical (ISM) radio band has its proponents, as well.

To help make sense of the torrid telemetry turbulence, 24x7 talked with the staunchest supporters of the two approaches. On one band is Jim Welch, vice president and general manager of Welch Allyn Protocol (Beaverton, Ore.), which manufactures telemetry equipment keyed to the ISM spectrum. On the other band is David Pettijohn, a longtime telemetry developer and WMTS supporter who worked with VitalCom (Tustin, Calif.) before joining GE Medical Systems Information Technologies (GEMSIT of Milwaukee) where he is manager of luminary accounts and technology.

To purchase the full text of this article, click here...

Article Tools
Email This Article
Reprint This Article
Write the Editor
Resources
Media Kit
Editorial Advisory Board
Advertiser Index
Reprints
News | Current Issue | Buyer's Guide | Classifieds | Archives | Calendar | Resources | Careers
About 24X7 | Contact Us | Subscribe | Read Weekly eNewsletter
Media Kit | Editorial Advisory Board | Advertiser Index | Reprints
Allied Healthcare
24X7 |  Chiropractic Products Magazine |  Clinical Lab Products (CLP) |  Orthodontic Products |  The Hearing Review
Hearing Products Report (HPR) |  HME Today |  Rehab Management |  Physical Therapy Products |  Plastic Surgery Products
Imaging Economics |  Medical Imaging |  RT |  Sleep Review
Medical Education
SynerMed Communications |  IMED Communications
Practice Growth
Practice Builders
Copyright © 2008 Ascend Media LLC | 24X7 | All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service